John MacArthur on the men God uses to lead his people:
Preachers are men--that's all. And men are not perfect, so there is no hope of perfection in ministry...Abraham was guilty of duplicity, yet he became the man of faith and the friend of God. Moses was a man of stuttering speech and a quick temper, yet he was the one chosen to lead a nation, to represent them before God, and to receive His law and deliver it to them. David was guilty of adultery, conspiracy, murder, and unfaithfulness as a husband and father, but he repented and was regarded as a man after God's own heart. He was also the greatest songwriter of all history. W still sing the songs of this 'sweet singer of Israel.' Elijah ran from Jezebel, pleading for euthanasia, but this same Elijah defied Ahab and all the prophets of Baal, and hear the still small voice of God at Horeb. In the midst of the heavenly vision, Isaiah said, 'I am a man with a dirty mouth; I live among people with dirty mouths. I'm certainly useless to you, O God.' But when he had been cleansed, he said, 'Here I am; send me, ' and God said, 'Go.'
Peter was another clay pot, the leader and spokesman of the twelve apostles, but he denied his Lord with oaths and curses, and even had the audacity to correct the Lord. However, he was restored by the compassion of Jesus in the midst of his disobedience, and was enabled by the power of the Holy Spirit to speak with such force on the day of Pentecost as to be the agent by which God orchestrated the great introduction of the church. John the apostle expected to be praised by Jesus for refusing to allow a man not of their company to cast out demons in the name of the Lord. Likewise, he and his brother James wanted to call down fire from heaven and burn up a Samaritan village, and they sent their motherto ask that they might be given the chief places in the kingdom. Yet John became the beloved disciple, the apostle of love, the eagle who soared to great heights. He became, it seems, the apostle who pierced the deepest into the mystery of the incarnation.
Are you seeing a pattern?
God's leaders are mere mortals and each of them has sin in their lives. Yet, by God's grace, they are called to lead his people. Expect faithfulness from them and do not tolerate grave error, but also be quick to forgive and to give grace. Those of us who are called to lead bear a great responsibility and the load is lighter if those whom we serve make bearing it a joy. "Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your
souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and
not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you." (Hebrews 13:17 ESV)
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Monday, July 30, 2012
Mescalero
This week I'm going with a group of people from our church here in Baileyville down to Mescalero, New Mexico. There's an RCA church in Mescalero that was planted among the Apache tribe there in 1907. Here's a fun-fact that many of you may not have known: the RCA has been a leading denomination in reaching Native Americans with the gospel. In fact the famous chief, Geronimo, was a member in the Reformed Church, although his conversion seemed to waver as you can read here. I'll be excited to partner with such a historic and important ministry.
We'll be there for about seven days and, Lord willing, we hope to get a lot accomplished in our time there. We'll be painting, doing concrete work, pulling down trees, and installing some windows from what it sounds like and I'm sure other things will come up. There's also a couple opportunities to be involved in youth groups and women's bible studies that we hope to take advantage of.
But, we also hope to do a good amount of worship as well. It is my hope that each member of the trip will come back being genuinely and sustainably nearer to the Lord. We'll be studying the whole book of Colossians and we'll be spending a good amount of time talking together about the Lord, his gospel, and its impact on our lives.
Pray for our group, if you would. Pray that we are kept safe, that we truly do serve the mission needs of the Mescalero Reformed Church, and that we grow in our love for the Lord.
We'll be there for about seven days and, Lord willing, we hope to get a lot accomplished in our time there. We'll be painting, doing concrete work, pulling down trees, and installing some windows from what it sounds like and I'm sure other things will come up. There's also a couple opportunities to be involved in youth groups and women's bible studies that we hope to take advantage of.
But, we also hope to do a good amount of worship as well. It is my hope that each member of the trip will come back being genuinely and sustainably nearer to the Lord. We'll be studying the whole book of Colossians and we'll be spending a good amount of time talking together about the Lord, his gospel, and its impact on our lives.
Pray for our group, if you would. Pray that we are kept safe, that we truly do serve the mission needs of the Mescalero Reformed Church, and that we grow in our love for the Lord.
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Boice on the Essential Nature of Preaching
James Montgomery Boice on the essential nature of preaching for the health and growth of a church:
"Many things are talked about as necessary for the health and growth of the church today. People talk about certain programs as essential. It is true that they are important. We have such a diversified culture that people have their own individual problems. The family is fragmented, and the kind of reinforcement along Christian lines that ought to take place in homes does not always take place. The church is trying to minister specifically at these points through programs. Still, if you think back to the time of the Great Awakening in this country, you will realize that churches at that time had hardly any programs at all, at least nothing that we would recognize as programs. There were no youth groups, no graded Sunday schools, no bowling leagues, no baseball teams. But those churches were healthy. Why? Because they had the faithful preaching of the Word."
How many of us would consider a church with faithful preaching and with no Sunday school, no programs, no youth group a successful church?
The apostles had no Sunday school, no programs, and no youth group, but they had the Spirit and the Word and their churches were on fire for the Lord.
Food for thought about our priorities and the measure of our success.
"Many things are talked about as necessary for the health and growth of the church today. People talk about certain programs as essential. It is true that they are important. We have such a diversified culture that people have their own individual problems. The family is fragmented, and the kind of reinforcement along Christian lines that ought to take place in homes does not always take place. The church is trying to minister specifically at these points through programs. Still, if you think back to the time of the Great Awakening in this country, you will realize that churches at that time had hardly any programs at all, at least nothing that we would recognize as programs. There were no youth groups, no graded Sunday schools, no bowling leagues, no baseball teams. But those churches were healthy. Why? Because they had the faithful preaching of the Word."
How many of us would consider a church with faithful preaching and with no Sunday school, no programs, no youth group a successful church?
The apostles had no Sunday school, no programs, and no youth group, but they had the Spirit and the Word and their churches were on fire for the Lord.
Food for thought about our priorities and the measure of our success.
Friday, July 27, 2012
The Missional Church?
The word "missional" has been very in vogue in recent years. It doesn't matter if you're a liberal or an evangelical, baptist, reformed, arminian, or calvinist you can embrace the word missional. Perhaps that's part of the appeal of the word. I'm sure that's part of its appeal in my denomination, the RCA. We like it because we can each make it mean what we want and speak the same language while remaining distinct in the manifestation of our missionality.
But, personally, I'm not one to go for "container" words. By container words I mean words that sound nice but are actually quite empty and allow you to fill them with your own meaning. Missional is the paradigmatic container word. A word that can mean so many different things to so many different people is not one that I'm prone to put a whole lot of trust in.
Matthew 28:18-20 is the beginning and the end of the discussion on the mission of the church. "Then Jesus came to them and said, 'All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in teh name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.'"
If your view of missional has this in mind then let's join hands in the labor of the Lord, brother. If not, then even if we use the same words we're not really speaking the same language.
Does Matthew 28 exhaust the idea of mission? No. But, if your idea of mission falls outside of those bounds you can be sure that it's not mission.
But, personally, I'm not one to go for "container" words. By container words I mean words that sound nice but are actually quite empty and allow you to fill them with your own meaning. Missional is the paradigmatic container word. A word that can mean so many different things to so many different people is not one that I'm prone to put a whole lot of trust in.
Matthew 28:18-20 is the beginning and the end of the discussion on the mission of the church. "Then Jesus came to them and said, 'All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in teh name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.'"
If your view of missional has this in mind then let's join hands in the labor of the Lord, brother. If not, then even if we use the same words we're not really speaking the same language.
Does Matthew 28 exhaust the idea of mission? No. But, if your idea of mission falls outside of those bounds you can be sure that it's not mission.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Abortion: The American Holocaust
We live in the time of a horrible holocaust. In less than 40 years over fifty million babies have been murdered in their own mother's wombs. That's 50,000,000. 1...2...3...4...5...6...7...50,000,000. Perhaps our outrage isn't kindled because we can't wrap our minds around that number, or perhaps it's because the people that are killed are rarely seen. See the facts and get a link to the Guttmacher PDF here.
But, according to the Guttmacher Institute (Planned Parenthood's policy wing) one in five conceived children are murdered in the womb. 1...2...3...4...dead. John...Ben...Suzie...Betty...Cindy. See that stat here.
Let me recommend a movie to watch. Perhaps you're pro-life and you want some motivation, watch this. Perhaps you're on the fence or you've never really thought about the issue, watch this.
But, according to the Guttmacher Institute (Planned Parenthood's policy wing) one in five conceived children are murdered in the womb. 1...2...3...4...dead. John...Ben...Suzie...Betty...
Let me recommend a movie to watch. Perhaps you're pro-life and you want some motivation, watch this. Perhaps you're on the fence or you've never really thought about the issue, watch this.
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Synod '13: The Final Vote
An insight on the BCO for my RCA brothers and sisters:
As many of you know the so called "conscience clauses" are on the chopping block. The CC's are provisions in the RCA's Book of Church Order that forbid a couple of things from happening. First, the clauses forbid those opposed to the ordination of women to obstruct by unconstitutional means the ordination of women in the RCA. Second, the clauses forbid those who support women's ordination from disciplining those who object due to their interpretation of Scripture.
There is a three step process for this removal to occur:
The first vote to strike them down occurred this past June at General Synod 2012. The proposal to remove the clauses from the BCO needed to obtain a 50%+1 vote and it cleared that hurdle with ease.
Now the vote goes to the classes (see: presbyteries) where 2/3 of them need to vote to approve the removal for this vote to return to General Synod 2013 for another vote. There are 45 classes so the proposed elimination requires approval by 30 of them. It is my guess that the 30 vote threshold will be met. I believe this for a number of reasons, but that's a post for another day.
Then the issue returns to General Synod 2013 for another vote requiring 50%+1.
Here's the insight I wanted to get to. Let's say for the sake of the argument that the 30 classis requirement is met. In this case it returns, once more, for final approval at the next General Synod. This requirement is found in the very last section of the General Synod section of the BCO. The problem here is that, as of late, there has been a very significant misunderstanding of this final vote. At this past synod the president of the synod opined that this vote was nothing more than a certification that the proper process was followed and that the two-thirds classis vote was achieved. However, she was not in-line in making this assertion. Certainly you can find that mindset stated nowhere in the BCO itself and Dr. Allan Janssen speaks directly contrary to that in his commentary on the BCO.
"The second synod's action is a 'declarative resolution.' Too often, that has been taken to be little more than a ratification of the broader church's wisdom as reflected by the vote of the classes. The declarative resolution should not, however, be viewed as a mere formality. The wording of this section makes clear that the second synod's action is taken 'at it's discretion,' and that it 'may' make its declarative action. Thus, the order allows for second thought on the part of the synod. The final vote remains the responsibility of that assembly and ought not to be taken lightly." (p.260)
If, as I expect, the classes vote to approve it would serve us well to keep this in mind and to come prepared ready to make a full (and better!) defense of the clauses at General Synod 2013. At the very least we should be prepared to set the record straight on the responsibility of the second synod in the decision making process.
As many of you know the so called "conscience clauses" are on the chopping block. The CC's are provisions in the RCA's Book of Church Order that forbid a couple of things from happening. First, the clauses forbid those opposed to the ordination of women to obstruct by unconstitutional means the ordination of women in the RCA. Second, the clauses forbid those who support women's ordination from disciplining those who object due to their interpretation of Scripture.
There is a three step process for this removal to occur:
The first vote to strike them down occurred this past June at General Synod 2012. The proposal to remove the clauses from the BCO needed to obtain a 50%+1 vote and it cleared that hurdle with ease.
Now the vote goes to the classes (see: presbyteries) where 2/3 of them need to vote to approve the removal for this vote to return to General Synod 2013 for another vote. There are 45 classes so the proposed elimination requires approval by 30 of them. It is my guess that the 30 vote threshold will be met. I believe this for a number of reasons, but that's a post for another day.
Then the issue returns to General Synod 2013 for another vote requiring 50%+1.
Here's the insight I wanted to get to. Let's say for the sake of the argument that the 30 classis requirement is met. In this case it returns, once more, for final approval at the next General Synod. This requirement is found in the very last section of the General Synod section of the BCO. The problem here is that, as of late, there has been a very significant misunderstanding of this final vote. At this past synod the president of the synod opined that this vote was nothing more than a certification that the proper process was followed and that the two-thirds classis vote was achieved. However, she was not in-line in making this assertion. Certainly you can find that mindset stated nowhere in the BCO itself and Dr. Allan Janssen speaks directly contrary to that in his commentary on the BCO.
"The second synod's action is a 'declarative resolution.' Too often, that has been taken to be little more than a ratification of the broader church's wisdom as reflected by the vote of the classes. The declarative resolution should not, however, be viewed as a mere formality. The wording of this section makes clear that the second synod's action is taken 'at it's discretion,' and that it 'may' make its declarative action. Thus, the order allows for second thought on the part of the synod. The final vote remains the responsibility of that assembly and ought not to be taken lightly." (p.260)
If, as I expect, the classes vote to approve it would serve us well to keep this in mind and to come prepared ready to make a full (and better!) defense of the clauses at General Synod 2013. At the very least we should be prepared to set the record straight on the responsibility of the second synod in the decision making process.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
50 Shades of Prey (Doug Wilson and More)
Pastor Doug Wilson has written a very sound critique of the reprehensible bestselling book, "50 Shades of Grey". I would highly encourage you to read it here.
The gist of the review is that abuse of women is never okay whether they "volunteered" for it or not. If you were to ask the average woman on the street, "when is it okay to hit a woman?" I'm sure that the overwhelming answer would be, "NEVER!" Then, if I may ask, why are so many women falling head-over-heels for this book?
For a short synopsis of the main dynamic between the characters check out this portion of the book.
"I don't want to lose him. In spite of all his demands, his need to control, his scary vices, I have never felt as alive as I do now. It's a thrill to be sitting here beside him. He's so unpredictable, sexy, smart, and funny. But his moods... oh -- and he wants to hurt me" (Fifty Shades, p. 259).
In response to this section Doug Wilson responds, "Yeah, well, there's that. 'Other than that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?'"
As an evangelical reformed Christian with a robust view of biblical manhood and womanhood this kind of putrid nonsense attacks the very core of what I believe the relationship between a man and a woman ought to be. A man should never do anything to harm a woman: not in the kitchen, not in the living room, and not in the bedroom. A man's (a husband's) role is to serve and to love as Jesus served and loved the church even giving his own life for her. Jesus does not dominate the church, he does not abuse the church, and he does not make unreasonable demands from the church; neither should any man do those things to his wife.
Women, do yourselves a favor; if you're tempted to reach for a book like this, don't. Reach for a Gospel. See in Christ how a woman should be treated. Don't read something that encourages creeps to turn you into an object for sadistic pleasure. Read the word of life that encourages men to love you with divine love.
Men, do yourself and your wife/daughters a favor; don't let that trash into your house. Don't let that sort of thing infiltrate their minds. Exercise your God-given responsibility to guard your home and by your own example show the very foolishness and backwardness of a book like 50 Shades of Prey.
The gist of the review is that abuse of women is never okay whether they "volunteered" for it or not. If you were to ask the average woman on the street, "when is it okay to hit a woman?" I'm sure that the overwhelming answer would be, "NEVER!" Then, if I may ask, why are so many women falling head-over-heels for this book?
For a short synopsis of the main dynamic between the characters check out this portion of the book.
"I don't want to lose him. In spite of all his demands, his need to control, his scary vices, I have never felt as alive as I do now. It's a thrill to be sitting here beside him. He's so unpredictable, sexy, smart, and funny. But his moods... oh -- and he wants to hurt me" (Fifty Shades, p. 259).
In response to this section Doug Wilson responds, "Yeah, well, there's that. 'Other than that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?'"
As an evangelical reformed Christian with a robust view of biblical manhood and womanhood this kind of putrid nonsense attacks the very core of what I believe the relationship between a man and a woman ought to be. A man should never do anything to harm a woman: not in the kitchen, not in the living room, and not in the bedroom. A man's (a husband's) role is to serve and to love as Jesus served and loved the church even giving his own life for her. Jesus does not dominate the church, he does not abuse the church, and he does not make unreasonable demands from the church; neither should any man do those things to his wife.
Women, do yourselves a favor; if you're tempted to reach for a book like this, don't. Reach for a Gospel. See in Christ how a woman should be treated. Don't read something that encourages creeps to turn you into an object for sadistic pleasure. Read the word of life that encourages men to love you with divine love.
Men, do yourself and your wife/daughters a favor; don't let that trash into your house. Don't let that sort of thing infiltrate their minds. Exercise your God-given responsibility to guard your home and by your own example show the very foolishness and backwardness of a book like 50 Shades of Prey.
Monday, July 23, 2012
MMQ: Mad @ God
Yesterday's text was Matthew
12:9-14. It is copied below for your convenience.
______________________________________
This is round two in Jesus' fight
with the Pharisees over the Sabbath in Mth. 12. In verse 13 he heals the man's
crippled hand, by the power of God, before their very eyes in open defiance
against their trumped up hypocritical interpretation of the Lord's Sabbath
command. Here's what I had to say about it yesterday morning.
And now you would
suspect that the Pharisees would have a time of serious self-inspection. You
would think that they would go away pondering why it was that Jesus was
vindicated before their very eyes. You would think that they would go away
wondering if he was right about their hypocrisy. I mean, c’mon, you’d have to
be absolutely mad not to at least consider what you’ve seen and heard.
But, that’s exactly what they are…they’re mad. They’re not a drool on yourself,
repeat yourself, talk gibberish, and think you’re Blackbeard the pirate kind of
mad. They’re worse. They’re a hate God kind of mad. They’re a “I refuse to be
wrong even when I am clearly wrong” kind of mad. They’re stubborn and proud and
no matter what the evidence may say they will not accept that they have been
wrong. And if they can’t trap Jesus and if they can’t confuse Jesus and if they
can’t stop Jesus, by George, then they’ll kill him.
Verse 14 says, “But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might
kill Jesus."
This reminds me of the 5th
question and answer of the Heidelberg Catechism. The Catechism asks if it is
possible to keep the law perfectly and responds, "No. I have a natural
tendency to hate God and my neighbor." Certainly the Pharisees exemplify
here those natural tendencies that reside within ever fallen sinful human
heart.
______________________________________
9 Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, 10
and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Looking for a reason to accuse
Jesus, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”
11 He said to them, “If any of you has a sheep and it falls
into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? 12
How much more valuable is a man than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to
do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then he
said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” So he stretched it out and it was
completely restored, just as sound as the other. 14 But the
Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Sin Unleashed
Tragedy can be horribly confusing. "Why did this happen?" is a common question. Certainly that question is going to be asked frequently in light of the movie theatre shooting in Aurora Colorado yesterday. The Fox News headline reads "horrific attack came out of nowhere." Why did it come at all?
James Egan Holmes has no criminal record, only one traffic ticket, and gave no one any reason to think that he was capable of something like this. He was a good student, a quiet and easy going neighbor, and apparently he's a mass murderer.
I'm sure many more details will come out as the police disarm the bombs and booby traps from his apartment, as detectives uncover every shred of evidence, as the media dissects his life, and as t.v. shrinks hypothesize about his innermost motivations and thoughts. But the one truth that can't be found in an apartment or on a transcript or through interviews is the one that offers the most insight. James Egan Holmes was a sinner and for whatever reason the sinful inclinations of his unrepentant and unconverted heart were unleashed on those unsuspecting people in Aurora.
Bad things happen for many reasons and yet for just one reason. Evil exists because we're part of a world in rebellion against God.
We need a savior, James Holmes needs a savior, let's pray that the savior reveals himself to this sin sick sinner.
Let's also pray for the victims who are still with us, pray for the families of those who died, and praise the Lord that he restrains sin to the extent that events like this are as rare as they are. We long for a world where this sort of thing never happens, we long for the New Earth, come Lord Jesus.
James Egan Holmes has no criminal record, only one traffic ticket, and gave no one any reason to think that he was capable of something like this. He was a good student, a quiet and easy going neighbor, and apparently he's a mass murderer.
I'm sure many more details will come out as the police disarm the bombs and booby traps from his apartment, as detectives uncover every shred of evidence, as the media dissects his life, and as t.v. shrinks hypothesize about his innermost motivations and thoughts. But the one truth that can't be found in an apartment or on a transcript or through interviews is the one that offers the most insight. James Egan Holmes was a sinner and for whatever reason the sinful inclinations of his unrepentant and unconverted heart were unleashed on those unsuspecting people in Aurora.
Bad things happen for many reasons and yet for just one reason. Evil exists because we're part of a world in rebellion against God.
We need a savior, James Holmes needs a savior, let's pray that the savior reveals himself to this sin sick sinner.
Let's also pray for the victims who are still with us, pray for the families of those who died, and praise the Lord that he restrains sin to the extent that events like this are as rare as they are. We long for a world where this sort of thing never happens, we long for the New Earth, come Lord Jesus.
Friday, July 20, 2012
America's Chicken Sandwich
I love Chick-fil-A. Their sandwiches are scrumptous, their employees are polite ("my pleasure"), their bathrooms are clean, and they're closed on Sundays. They're also about to go through a very rough patch.
This week the president of Chick-fil-A stepped on a cultural landmine. “I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say ‘we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage and I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.” ~ Dan Cathy, President, Chick-fil-A
Anyone who pays attention to anything knows that this is the hot-button issue in the church and culture-at-large today, I'm sure Dan Cathy was aware of that when he said what he did.
Now, I don't believe in "Christian businesses", I'm quite sure there won't be Chick-fil-A in heaven (although their food is heavenly), and corporations aren't converted, justified, and glorified. But, I do believe that the church should impact and influence culture in many ways with business being one of them. I'm happy to see a company run on Christian principles such as Lord's Day observance and support for biblical marriage in our day.
Unfortunately, many in our nation don't share this appreciation and Chick-fil-A is about to feel the wrath of the world, and I hope it's up to the task. They're going to be boycotted, picketed, kicked off university campuses, advertised against, banned from sponsorship, and the list goes on. There will be (it's probably already begun) a full blown culture-war against Chick-fil-A.
I'd like to help ease the fury about to be unleashed and here's a suggestion from Bryan Fischer from American Family Radio. "Fortunately, there is a way for defenders of the family to show their support in tangible ways: let’s buy Chick-fil-A out of every last one of their chicken sandwiches. You’ll like ‘em (you better believe I will!), they’ll just make more, Dan Cathy will thank you, and what the gay lobby intends for evil will be turned by values-driven Americans into something good. Let’s make Chick-fil-A America’s official chicken chain."
This week the president of Chick-fil-A stepped on a cultural landmine. “I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say ‘we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage and I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.” ~ Dan Cathy, President, Chick-fil-A
Anyone who pays attention to anything knows that this is the hot-button issue in the church and culture-at-large today, I'm sure Dan Cathy was aware of that when he said what he did.
Now, I don't believe in "Christian businesses", I'm quite sure there won't be Chick-fil-A in heaven (although their food is heavenly), and corporations aren't converted, justified, and glorified. But, I do believe that the church should impact and influence culture in many ways with business being one of them. I'm happy to see a company run on Christian principles such as Lord's Day observance and support for biblical marriage in our day.
Unfortunately, many in our nation don't share this appreciation and Chick-fil-A is about to feel the wrath of the world, and I hope it's up to the task. They're going to be boycotted, picketed, kicked off university campuses, advertised against, banned from sponsorship, and the list goes on. There will be (it's probably already begun) a full blown culture-war against Chick-fil-A.
I'd like to help ease the fury about to be unleashed and here's a suggestion from Bryan Fischer from American Family Radio. "Fortunately, there is a way for defenders of the family to show their support in tangible ways: let’s buy Chick-fil-A out of every last one of their chicken sandwiches. You’ll like ‘em (you better believe I will!), they’ll just make more, Dan Cathy will thank you, and what the gay lobby intends for evil will be turned by values-driven Americans into something good. Let’s make Chick-fil-A America’s official chicken chain."
Thursday, July 19, 2012
IT'S A TRAP!
In doing my exegesis on Matthew 12:9-14 I came across this bit of analytical genius from an unlikely source.
9 Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, 10 and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”
11 He said to them, “If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? 12 How much more valuable is a man than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” So he stretched it out and it was completely restored, just as sound as the other. 14 But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.
9 Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, 10 and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”
11 He said to them, “If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? 12 How much more valuable is a man than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” So he stretched it out and it was completely restored, just as sound as the other. 14 But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
What's in the Heart Comes to Mind
It's funny what we think of sometimes, isn't it?
I remember when I was younger one of my least favorite things to do was to watch my younger brother's soccer games. Besides the fact that I understood very little about the game I was convinced (by plenty of evidence!) that he cared more about the dandelions at his feet than he did for the ball. When I was playing youth baseball a number of years later we lost a game (in part) because the second basemen was daydreaming and totally missed a ball that fell right behind him...he hadn't even seen it coming, he was writing the name of his crush in the dirt by the base. What compels us to think of these things? I like to think that my brother was as bored by soccer as I am (he'll deny it!). The young second baseman did what many guys do...he daydreamed about girls.
But, just the other day I had an unusual experience of my own. I was sick last Tuesday night. I came down with a very violent case of the stomach flu and spent most of 8 hours in the bathroom doing what sick people do. It was miserable: I was dehydrated, physically exhausted, sick, running a fever, I had hot sweats and cold sweats, I was in really really rough shape. And at about 2:30 in the morning in the midst of one of the worst episodes of the evening something came to my head and I began to sing. "Cast your cares on the Lord and he will sustain you." And even in the midst of my misery there was comfort in the word of the Lord.
Check out this song.
My wife has been listening to "Seeds Family Worship" lately. They put out CD's with songs using the words of Scripture. (They just started using the ESV which makes me quite happy.) Just having these on in the car, at work, or while we're home has been a great way for writing the word on my heart.
You think of a lot of things at 2:30 in the morning when you're sicker than sick. But you can't think of Scripture passages you don't know! Go ahead and give these a shot, you never know when you may be especially glad you did.
I remember when I was younger one of my least favorite things to do was to watch my younger brother's soccer games. Besides the fact that I understood very little about the game I was convinced (by plenty of evidence!) that he cared more about the dandelions at his feet than he did for the ball. When I was playing youth baseball a number of years later we lost a game (in part) because the second basemen was daydreaming and totally missed a ball that fell right behind him...he hadn't even seen it coming, he was writing the name of his crush in the dirt by the base. What compels us to think of these things? I like to think that my brother was as bored by soccer as I am (he'll deny it!). The young second baseman did what many guys do...he daydreamed about girls.
But, just the other day I had an unusual experience of my own. I was sick last Tuesday night. I came down with a very violent case of the stomach flu and spent most of 8 hours in the bathroom doing what sick people do. It was miserable: I was dehydrated, physically exhausted, sick, running a fever, I had hot sweats and cold sweats, I was in really really rough shape. And at about 2:30 in the morning in the midst of one of the worst episodes of the evening something came to my head and I began to sing. "Cast your cares on the Lord and he will sustain you." And even in the midst of my misery there was comfort in the word of the Lord.
Check out this song.
My wife has been listening to "Seeds Family Worship" lately. They put out CD's with songs using the words of Scripture. (They just started using the ESV which makes me quite happy.) Just having these on in the car, at work, or while we're home has been a great way for writing the word on my heart.
You think of a lot of things at 2:30 in the morning when you're sicker than sick. But you can't think of Scripture passages you don't know! Go ahead and give these a shot, you never know when you may be especially glad you did.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
We Didn't Come Here To Leave!
As I was reading Don Kistler's essay, Preaching With Authority, I had to laugh at a short story he recounts. "I have a dear friend who often supplies the pulpit in an African American church in Pittsburgh. His first time there was an eye-opener for him. He was introduced to speak after an hour and forty minutes. He asked his host how long he had to preach. The response was, 'Till you're done, brother; we didn't come here to leave!'"
Convicting, isn't it? I grew up in a regular evangelical church where the service was typically 60-70 minutes long and I usually started getting antsy at about the 40 minute mark. I could sit through 9 innings of a Cubs game by age six without a problem and if there were extra innings all the better! But extra sermon at age sixteen? No thanks.
I'm not sure why we do this to ourselves. We get all dressed up (well...some of us do anyways), we drive (or walk) to church, and then when we're there we can't help but steal that glance (or four) at the clock on the wall. We hope for overtime, extra innings, a double episode, or another hour with our date. But extra sermon? No thanks.
Here's something I wish I had been challenged to do long ago: treat the worship service like you're in the very presence of God (you are), treat the faithful preacher like he's Jesus preaching to you (he is), and believe that your time in corporate worship is the most important time in your week (it is). Worship with God's redeemed people is an incredible blessing. Worship is time for the living God to receive our praise, bless us through hearing our prayers, and to correct us, admonish us, teach us, and train us for the work he generously gives us to do! Why would we come just to leave?!
And, oh yeah, if you can get rid of the clock on the wall...go for it.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Monday Morning Quarterback: Mth 12:1-8
Matthew 12:1-8
The Christian life is a balance, a narrow road if you will, in which there are dangers to either side. Too far to the one side and you fall into unrepentant rebellion against God's law. Too far to the other side and you become a cold-hearted legalistic idolater. How do you walk the balance? By knowing God, following Christ, and through the enabling work of the Spirit.
We must know God if we are to understand his word properly. This is where the Pharisees went so horribly wrong. Verse seven says as much. "If you had known what this means, "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless." Notice that the verse Jesus quotes from Hosea is a passage about God's heart. It's not that they merely misunderstood a command, no, they misunderstood God's own heart. They were, quite simply, idolaters. They worshipped a god who was merciless, graceless, and loveless. They worshipped a god who was, not coincidentally, just like themselves.
If there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the character and nature of God in your heart or mind it will lead you into idolatry. This is why the early church struggled so valiantly to define clearly what the Scripture teaches about God. This is why we should labor humbly in the word of God, studying the Lord himself, so we will be able to defend our own hearts and minds from the mistakes of the Pharisees.
"And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." (John 17:3)
--Looking to learn more about the character of God? I highly recommend J.I. Packer's classic work, Knowing God.
The Christian life is a balance, a narrow road if you will, in which there are dangers to either side. Too far to the one side and you fall into unrepentant rebellion against God's law. Too far to the other side and you become a cold-hearted legalistic idolater. How do you walk the balance? By knowing God, following Christ, and through the enabling work of the Spirit.
We must know God if we are to understand his word properly. This is where the Pharisees went so horribly wrong. Verse seven says as much. "If you had known what this means, "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless." Notice that the verse Jesus quotes from Hosea is a passage about God's heart. It's not that they merely misunderstood a command, no, they misunderstood God's own heart. They were, quite simply, idolaters. They worshipped a god who was merciless, graceless, and loveless. They worshipped a god who was, not coincidentally, just like themselves.
If there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the character and nature of God in your heart or mind it will lead you into idolatry. This is why the early church struggled so valiantly to define clearly what the Scripture teaches about God. This is why we should labor humbly in the word of God, studying the Lord himself, so we will be able to defend our own hearts and minds from the mistakes of the Pharisees.
"And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." (John 17:3)
--Looking to learn more about the character of God? I highly recommend J.I. Packer's classic work, Knowing God.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Sproul on Luther's Certain Assertions
R.C. Sproul writes about Luther's insistence on asserting the truth of Scripture and with great conviction and confidence.
"'Nothing is more familiar or characteristic among Christians than assertion. Take away assertions, and you take away Christianity.' Then, in his passion, Luther said: 'Away, now, with Skeptics and Academics from the company of us Christians; let us have men who will assert.'"
"Luther would have none of the spirit of those who are always learning and never coming to a knowledge of the truth (2 Tim. 3:7). The foundational truths of Christianity were built on the blood of the martyrs, because the apostles didn't go into the marketplace saying: 'Well, maybe Jesus rose from the dead or maybe He didn't. You need to examine this, and suspend judgment.' No, they were bold in their assertions because they know what they believed (2 Tim. 1:8-12). They understood the things of God, were convinced of the truth of the claims of Jesus, and, having that assurance and certainty of the truthfulness and trustworthiness of Scripture, they went boldly into a dying world. Luther did the same."
Feed My Sheep. Sproul. 77
"'Nothing is more familiar or characteristic among Christians than assertion. Take away assertions, and you take away Christianity.' Then, in his passion, Luther said: 'Away, now, with Skeptics and Academics from the company of us Christians; let us have men who will assert.'"
"Luther would have none of the spirit of those who are always learning and never coming to a knowledge of the truth (2 Tim. 3:7). The foundational truths of Christianity were built on the blood of the martyrs, because the apostles didn't go into the marketplace saying: 'Well, maybe Jesus rose from the dead or maybe He didn't. You need to examine this, and suspend judgment.' No, they were bold in their assertions because they know what they believed (2 Tim. 1:8-12). They understood the things of God, were convinced of the truth of the claims of Jesus, and, having that assurance and certainty of the truthfulness and trustworthiness of Scripture, they went boldly into a dying world. Luther did the same."
Feed My Sheep. Sproul. 77
Friday, July 13, 2012
Does Your Pastor Love Jesus?
A few questions to ask yourself if you're ever looking for a pastoral candidate:
--Is this man converted?
--Does he believe the Bible is true and inspired by God?
--Does he love Jesus?
James Montgomery Boice quotes a sermon from Gilbert Tennent (1740) where Tennent speaks about just this. "Natural men [that is, unconverted men] have no call of God to the ministerial work. So if a godly man finds himself in a church or denomination in which such natural men hold rule, then it is both lawful and expedient to go from there to hear godly persons."
Don't ever put yourself (or, men, your family) in the position of sitting under an unconverted mininstry. Be willing to ask the hard questions, and sometimes the obvious questions, of your pastor. A man in my congregation ended up in our church because he asked his former pastor if he believed in God and the man said no! Unfortunately, I'm not sure that's all that uncommon. Boice says of ministers, "Ministers are somewhat reluctant to say what they really believe because, if they do, their congregations are likely to get rid of them. They will be out looking for another job. But they do say what they believe in the company of other ministers."
So put your pastor (or pastoral candidate) on the spot, ask the tough questions, make sure he genuinely agrees with your statement of faith, and protect yourself and your family from the danger of an unconverted minister.
(Feed My Sheep, 27. Reformation Trust. 2008)
--Is this man converted?
--Does he believe the Bible is true and inspired by God?
--Does he love Jesus?
James Montgomery Boice quotes a sermon from Gilbert Tennent (1740) where Tennent speaks about just this. "Natural men [that is, unconverted men] have no call of God to the ministerial work. So if a godly man finds himself in a church or denomination in which such natural men hold rule, then it is both lawful and expedient to go from there to hear godly persons."
Don't ever put yourself (or, men, your family) in the position of sitting under an unconverted mininstry. Be willing to ask the hard questions, and sometimes the obvious questions, of your pastor. A man in my congregation ended up in our church because he asked his former pastor if he believed in God and the man said no! Unfortunately, I'm not sure that's all that uncommon. Boice says of ministers, "Ministers are somewhat reluctant to say what they really believe because, if they do, their congregations are likely to get rid of them. They will be out looking for another job. But they do say what they believe in the company of other ministers."
So put your pastor (or pastoral candidate) on the spot, ask the tough questions, make sure he genuinely agrees with your statement of faith, and protect yourself and your family from the danger of an unconverted minister.
(Feed My Sheep, 27. Reformation Trust. 2008)
Thursday, July 12, 2012
The Ironic Coronation of a GS Professor
I'm all for examinations. I think that elder candidates in the local church
should be examined on whether they fit the criteria established for them in 1
Timothy and Titus. I think candidates for the pastorate should be intensely
examined on their theology, piety, skills for ministry, and biblical knowledge
in addition to the qualifications for elder in 1 Timothy and Titus. And, if the
office must exist, I think that candidates for General Synod Professor of
Theology should be the most vigorously examined. These men and women are
responsible for training the pastors for our denomination, they speak with
palpable gravitas at General Synod, they serve on commissions and frequently as
delegates to the synod.
I hate coronations. It makes me feel physically queasy when I realize that someone's installation to a significant office of authority within Christ's church is a done deal before it should be. When we as the church abdicate our responsibility to examine potential office bearers we do ourselves and the glory of Christ no favors.
Unfortunately, we had a coronation at this past General Synod. Rev. Dr. Allan Janssen was nominated by the board of trustees of New Brunswick Theological Seminary and was elected by a (voice) vote of the General Synod. There was, however, no examination whatsoever. In fact it was apparent from the beginning that his election was a done deal. It was so obvious that in the workbook given to each delegate at the beginning of the week the following phrase was placed in the schedule "3:45: Colleges, Seminaries and MFCA, installation of GS professor Janssen." His installation was planned and scheduled before the synod had even had a chance to elect him (or not).
The issue in all of this is that according to the BCO the synod could have rejected Dr. Janssen even though the workbook had his installation scheduled and the President of the synod spoke openly of his installation before he was elected. Should they have turned him away? I don't know, and that's the problem. Maybe Dr. Janssen is a great Christian man with a brilliant mind and will serve the church well, or perhaps not. How was the average delegate to know? The BCO says, "A General Synod professor shall be elected by the General Synod by a majority vote of the members present." Technically we fulfilled the letter of the law, but it's clear to me that the spirit of the law was violated. Apparently Dr. Janssen thinks so as well. Writing in his own commentary on RCA church order he writes concerning the election of GS professors, "Finally, the church assures itself of broad support by requiring the election by a majority vote of the synod. The nomination of a candidate should not presume on election." (Constitutional Theology, 251)
Ironically, if ever there was a presumed election it was this one. My hope is that Dr. Janssen was screaming on the inside, that he insisted on a more genuine process but was turned down. I hope he was as uncomfortable with the process as I was. My disappointment is that it seems that in the modern church we've lost our stomach for serious examination and we have settled for pomp and circumstance coronations.
I hate coronations. It makes me feel physically queasy when I realize that someone's installation to a significant office of authority within Christ's church is a done deal before it should be. When we as the church abdicate our responsibility to examine potential office bearers we do ourselves and the glory of Christ no favors.
Unfortunately, we had a coronation at this past General Synod. Rev. Dr. Allan Janssen was nominated by the board of trustees of New Brunswick Theological Seminary and was elected by a (voice) vote of the General Synod. There was, however, no examination whatsoever. In fact it was apparent from the beginning that his election was a done deal. It was so obvious that in the workbook given to each delegate at the beginning of the week the following phrase was placed in the schedule "3:45: Colleges, Seminaries and MFCA, installation of GS professor Janssen." His installation was planned and scheduled before the synod had even had a chance to elect him (or not).
The issue in all of this is that according to the BCO the synod could have rejected Dr. Janssen even though the workbook had his installation scheduled and the President of the synod spoke openly of his installation before he was elected. Should they have turned him away? I don't know, and that's the problem. Maybe Dr. Janssen is a great Christian man with a brilliant mind and will serve the church well, or perhaps not. How was the average delegate to know? The BCO says, "A General Synod professor shall be elected by the General Synod by a majority vote of the members present." Technically we fulfilled the letter of the law, but it's clear to me that the spirit of the law was violated. Apparently Dr. Janssen thinks so as well. Writing in his own commentary on RCA church order he writes concerning the election of GS professors, "Finally, the church assures itself of broad support by requiring the election by a majority vote of the synod. The nomination of a candidate should not presume on election." (Constitutional Theology, 251)
Ironically, if ever there was a presumed election it was this one. My hope is that Dr. Janssen was screaming on the inside, that he insisted on a more genuine process but was turned down. I hope he was as uncomfortable with the process as I was. My disappointment is that it seems that in the modern church we've lost our stomach for serious examination and we have settled for pomp and circumstance coronations.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The Lord Provides
The last couple days were rough in the Kappers' household. Melanie came down with the stomach-flu early in the morning and was generally out of commission for the whole day. That left me to play Pastor Ben and Mr. Mom. I did my usual Tuesday morning reading, made the worship bulletin for this week, blogged, and took care of a few other pastoral responsibilities and then I also changed diapers, made meals, went to the grocery store, put Caleb down for his naps and got him up from his naps. I was feeling exhausted by noon!
This reminded me of a passage from Genesis, "The Lord God said, 'It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.'" (2:18) The Lord in his infinite wisdom knew that days like yesterday would not be a healthy norm for his creature formed in his very own image. Man would benefit greatly from sharing responsibilities with a counterpart. And so the Lord made woman, and praise him for it!
Sometimes it takes a day like yesterday to remind us of the wisdom and generous providence of our heavenly Father. I have a wife who shares and bears many responsibilities that I simply couldn't handle day-in and day-out on my own.
I'm thankful for the Lord's provision in my life and for Melanie's service to our family...I just wish she hadn't shared her stomach flu with me.
This reminded me of a passage from Genesis, "The Lord God said, 'It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.'" (2:18) The Lord in his infinite wisdom knew that days like yesterday would not be a healthy norm for his creature formed in his very own image. Man would benefit greatly from sharing responsibilities with a counterpart. And so the Lord made woman, and praise him for it!
Sometimes it takes a day like yesterday to remind us of the wisdom and generous providence of our heavenly Father. I have a wife who shares and bears many responsibilities that I simply couldn't handle day-in and day-out on my own.
I'm thankful for the Lord's provision in my life and for Melanie's service to our family...I just wish she hadn't shared her stomach flu with me.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
What's the Purpose?
This week Melanie (my wife) and I are reading through Titus, Proverbs 11-15 and Psalms 111-120. As I began my reading this morning I was struck by these verses from Titus.
Titus 1:1-3 "Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God's elect and their knowledge of the truth, which accords with godliness, in hope of eternal life, which God, who never lies, promised before the ages began and at the proper time manifested in his word through the preaching with which I have been entrusted by the command of God our Savior;" (ESV)
When I was in Jr. High I only knew how to write one kind of sentence--a run-on sentence. I'd write entire paragraphs and forget to put any periods in there because I was so into what I was writing about. Needless to say my English grades were never very high. Most times I had a hard time reading what I had originally written because the red ink was so thick.
I suspect my teachers wouldn't have liked Paul's sentence here much either, but if ever there was a power-packed and rich run-on sentence this is it.
Paul is an apostle, but not for his own sake, he's an apostle for the sake of God's elect. He's an apostle for God's purposes so that his people might be knowledgeable of the truth, godly, hopeful, and eternally secure. Paul accomplishes God's purpose through preaching. No gimmicks, no self-aggrandizement, no glamour, just preaching. Praise the Lord for the power of his word.
We spend much time these days speaking of purpose. One of the best selling books and Bible studies of our day is "The Purpose Driven Life". Paul's purpose was to serve God's people, God's truth, and to testify to God's glory. Is that your purpose today?
Monday, July 9, 2012
Monday Morning Quarterback
Each Monday I'll be posting a bit of a recap or highlight from the previous Sunday's sermon. If I'm on the road you'll be blessed with a few notes from the sermon I sat under. In Baileyville we've spent most of the last year going through Matthew's Gospel. I find that the American church has many ideas about Jesus and his mission...and I find many of them to be entirely unfounded or at the least greatly misguided. It has been my hope in the Matthew series to give Christ's flock in the congregation I serve a robust and healthy understanding of the one to whom all honor is due. This past week we finished up Matthew 11 with a sermon on verses 25-30, "The Gracious Invitation".
Check out this blurb from Sunday's Message:
A whole nation of people had been weakened by false teaching and burdened by extra rules and regulations. Jesus comes to these people, people who are being crushed under the weight of pride and self-righteous attempts at salvation, and he says, “come to me, you who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest.”
What a relief. Perhaps you can feel it too. You’ve spent your whole life trying to be good enough, trying to do just the right things, trying to appear godly. But, somewhere deep down, you knew it wasn’t enough. You knew that your works weren’t up to the task, you knew your sin was too great to make up for on your own. You knew that just being a good person wouldn’t cut it with God. You have felt the reality that your sins are entirely too wicked to be made up for with the good deeds you do which are never quite good enough. And so you too became weary and burdened, your soul was full of angst and your spirit was oppressed with knowledge of your own inadequacy. And now, into the midst of that chaos, Jesus says, “Come to me, you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” In other words: Stop trying to save yourself, stop trying to impress others with your goodness, stop trying to be good enough to earn God’s favor. Trust me. Come to me. Listen to me. And find rest in me.
This passage was a familiar one for me, as it is for many people. But there was still something refreshing, comforting, and deeply satisfying about it. Even a pastor steeped in the Reformed faith can find the temptation to legalism and works-righteousness to be quite strong and it is good to be reminded of Chirst's sufficiency and his gracious invitation to sinners to find rest in him.
Check out this blurb from Sunday's Message:
A whole nation of people had been weakened by false teaching and burdened by extra rules and regulations. Jesus comes to these people, people who are being crushed under the weight of pride and self-righteous attempts at salvation, and he says, “come to me, you who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest.”
What a relief. Perhaps you can feel it too. You’ve spent your whole life trying to be good enough, trying to do just the right things, trying to appear godly. But, somewhere deep down, you knew it wasn’t enough. You knew that your works weren’t up to the task, you knew your sin was too great to make up for on your own. You knew that just being a good person wouldn’t cut it with God. You have felt the reality that your sins are entirely too wicked to be made up for with the good deeds you do which are never quite good enough. And so you too became weary and burdened, your soul was full of angst and your spirit was oppressed with knowledge of your own inadequacy. And now, into the midst of that chaos, Jesus says, “Come to me, you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” In other words: Stop trying to save yourself, stop trying to impress others with your goodness, stop trying to be good enough to earn God’s favor. Trust me. Come to me. Listen to me. And find rest in me.
This passage was a familiar one for me, as it is for many people. But there was still something refreshing, comforting, and deeply satisfying about it. Even a pastor steeped in the Reformed faith can find the temptation to legalism and works-righteousness to be quite strong and it is good to be reminded of Chirst's sufficiency and his gracious invitation to sinners to find rest in him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)